Will the Newborn Baby Get Cloth Upon Delivery at Iu Methodist Hospital Indianapolis
BREAKING – Three studies published past the CDC, UK Government & Oxford University find the Covid-xix Vaccines do non work
A graduate of Yale Academy who also obtained a PHD at Princeton University and an MD caste from the John Hopkins University School of Medicine has published a paper in which she concludes that mandating the public to take a vaccine is a harmful and dissentious act because of excellent scientific research papers which clearly demonstrate the vaccines do non foreclose infection or transmission of Covid-19.
Nina Pierpont (Medico, PhD) published a paper on September 9th analysing various studies that were published in August 2021 which testify the alleged Delta Covid-19 variant is evading the current Covid-nineteen injections on offering and therefore do not prevent infection or manual of Covid-19.
The Doctor of Medicine explained in her published paper that vaccines aim to achieve two ends –
- Protect the vaccinated person against the illness
- Keep vaccinated people from carrying the infection and transmitting it to others.
However, the Dr. of Medicine writes that herd immunity will not be reached through vaccination because new research in multiple settings shows that the declared Delta variant produces very high viral loads which are simply as high in the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated population.
Therefore, according to Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD), vaccine mandates; such equally the ane now enforced in the UK for all Care Dwelling staff, take no justification because vaccinating individuals does not stop or even deadening the spread of the alleged dominant Delta Covid-19 variant.
Which leads the Dr. of Medicine to conclude that natural immunity is much more protective than vaccination because all severities of Covid-xix illness produce healthy levels of natural amnesty.
Nine Pierpont (Physician, PhD) cites 3 studies whose findings and data support her conclusions and these include a study published August 6th 2021 in the Heart for Affliction Control's (CDC) 'Morbidity and Bloodshed Weekly Report', some other written report published Baronial tenth 2021 past Oxford Academy, and a final study published August 24th 2021 which was funded by the Great britain Department for Wellness and Social Care.
CDC Written report
The CDC study focused on 469 cases amid Massachusetts residents who attended indoor and outdoor public gatherings over a two week menstruation. The results found that 346 of the cases were among vaccinated residents with 74% of them presenting with declared Covid-xix symptoms, and 1.2% beingness hospitalised.
Still the remaining 123 cases were among the unvaccinated population with but i person being hospitalised (0.8%. No deaths occurred in either group. The written report also found that viral loads were found to exist very like among the vaccinated and unvaccinated, meaning they were as infectious.
Oxford University Study
The Oxford University study examined 900 hospital staff members in Vietnam who had been vaccinated with the Oxford / AstraZeneca viral vector injection betwixt March and April 2021. The entire infirmary staff tested negative for the Covid-19 virus in mid May 2021 withal, the starting time case amongst the vaccinated staff members was discovered on June 11th.
All 900 infirmary staff were then retested for the Covid-xix virus and 52 additional cases were identified immediately, forcing the infirmary into lockdown. Over the next two weeks, xvi additional cases were identified.
The written report establish that 76% of the Covid-19 positive staff developed respiratory symptoms, with iii staff members developing pneumonia and one staff member requiring iii days of oxygen therapy. Peak viral loads among the fully vaccinated infected group were constitute to be 251 times higher than peak viral loads found amidst the staff in March – April 2020 when they were not vaccinated.
Great britain Section of Wellness & Social Care Study
The United kingdom Department of Health & Social Care report is an analysis of ongoing population wide SARS-CoV-2 monitoring in the UK and includes measures of viral load amidst the population.
The study found that viral loads amidst the vaccinated and unvaccinated population are near the aforementioned, and much higher than had been recorded prior to the Covid-19 injection roll-out. The study also plant that the majority of cases amid the vaccinated population were presenting with symptoms when they became positive.
The authors of the study conclude that the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca injection have lost efficacy confronting what they claim to be the Delta Covid-19 variant, but they maintain that they are substantially effective at keeping people from becoming infected with the Delta variant in the range of 67% to eighty%.
Nine Pierpont (MD, PhD) rightly asks in her newspaper how they can conclude this when 82% of the random sample of new positive PCR tests in the study were fully vaccinated people.
The Doctor of Medicine writes –
'If a vaccine reduces the risk of condign infected by two-thirds (67%), we would expect the proportion of vaccinated in the positive sample to exist less than the proportion of vaccinated in the population.
Say nosotros start with chiliad people in the country, of whom we volition randomly sample 100. The country is 80% vaccinated. This ways that in our sample of 100 we have 80 vaccinated and xx unvaccinated people.
Let's say that the virus has infected 10% of the people beyond the sampling period, or 10 total cases. If 8 of the infected are among the vaccinated, and two in the unvaccinated (80% and 20% of the positives, matching the ratio of vaccinated and unvaccinated in the population), the vaccine has made no difference in whether one can get infected (0% efficacy). If the vaccine is 67% effective, the cases in the vaccinated group would be reduced by 2/three to two.67 cases, and the full cases would be only 4.67 cases (two.67 vaccinated and 2 unvaccinated).
This ways that only 2.67/iv.67 or 57% of the cases would be in the vaccinated group, and 43% in the unvaccinated. (Nosotros can go back to 10% overall being positive just using ratios, yielding 5.vii cases among the vaccinated and four.3 among the unvaccinated.)
This is why the proportion vaccinated in the infected sample, very close to the proportions vaccinated in the total population, are incompatible with the efficacy numbers generated past the authors.
It appears to me—as in the Massachusetts study—that the vaccine is not decreasing susceptibility to infection at all, and is in reality somewhere between slightly (insignificantly) decreasing susceptibility and slightly increasing susceptibility to the Delta variant.
The U.k. report is clear that viral load (and thus infectiousness to others) is much greater with Delta than with Blastoff, and that, with Delta, viral load and infectiousness are equal in vaccinated and unvaccinated infected people.'
The higher up three studies lead Nina Pierpont (Doctor, PhD) to conclude in her newspaper that mandating others to accept a vaccine is a potentially harmful, damaging human activity.
She writes that since the principal reason of a mandate is to protect others from infection, and these studies prove beyond a shadow of a uncertainty that they do not do this, those who mandate the Covid-19 injections may wish to seek legal counsel regarding their culpability and liability for potential long-lasting harm to those whom they pressure level into vaccination with the threat of exclusion from employment, education or society.
Source: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/12/three-studies-find-the-covid-19-vaccines-do-not-work/
0 Response to "Will the Newborn Baby Get Cloth Upon Delivery at Iu Methodist Hospital Indianapolis"
Post a Comment